Is dining out greener than cooking at home?

Posted by pelf on December 29, 2007

You see, I’m not very much a cook, despite being a latch-key kid when I was in my teens and I had to so-called cook lunch for my sister and I when we got home from school. But that was merely re-heating the (already cooked) rice and pot of soup and probably fry some vegetables, that was all. And when I came to the university, not surprisingly, I ended up dining out most of the time.

Now, this is to make myself feel better: Suppose I can walk into a food stall/restaurant, can I assume that the way a restaurant cooks is almost more efficient and thus more green? Or are restaurants almost always more wasteful overall? Perhaps because they don’t use local ingredients (who knows?), they keep their stoves on, they use and wash too many dishes, they keep all the lights switched on, etc.?

Take, for example, a loaf of bread. Is it greener to bake your own bread or to buy it from a bakery? To me the answer is quite obvious since a bakery bakes many dough at once. I also think that if a bakery can predict roughly the demand on its bread, it will generate much less waste.

Bread
Image credit: Beachy.

Consider this scenario:

There are 50 people in a restaurant, and all of them turn out all their lights when they leave home, that’s many houses that won’t be using electricity, and one restaurant that will be, even if there is an enormous amount of lighting, I doubt it will be more then those homes. A green restaurant that focuses on efficiency would be much greener than eating at home simply because of economies of scale and concentrating the means at one point.

Now the food, they buy in bulk, which means less packaging. The ovens and stoves are always on, but they’re cooking multiple meals with them at all time, whereas at home you would only be cooking for yourself (or perhaps for your family of 4 or 5 persons), and they’re using more energy because it is an industrial stove, but they’re cooking for dozens of people at the same time. So it possibly could be greener from an energy standpoint.

There is also the “green” side of it with chemicals, if you eat at home you choose what goes into your food, if you eat out, you are going to eat whatever they put into the food — chemicals and all. There are also the chemicals they use for cleaning, de-greasing, etc. In restaurants, almost everything is cleaned in bleach solution, which kills all the bacteria — and some people think this is creating strains of super germs that are resistant to such methods of cleaning.

However, you also have to consider the energy it takes to get to the restaurant though. Your traveling for one meal, as opposed to if you were buying groceries for many meals. Plus, it also has a lot to do with what restaurant you are going to and the amount of energy in the food itself.

So, what do you think? Is dining out greener than cooking at home?

Filed in Environment

If you think this post might benefit other bloggers:



Similar posts you might be interested in:

5 Comments

Trackbacks

Have something to say? Join the discussion!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. Subscribe to these comments.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>